The best online Debate website - DebateIsland.com! The only Online Debate Website with Casual, Persuade Me, Formalish, and Formal Online Debate formats. We’re the Leading Online Debate website. Debate popular topics, Debate news, or Debate anything! Debate online for free!
Should America have gun control?
in Politics
Debra AI Prediction
Arguments
  Considerate: 83%  
  Substantial: 91%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.56  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 83%  
  Learn More About Debra
@Zombieguy1987
CYDdharta didn't answer the question.
He answered the question this way:
Because, do you know what you sound like?
A an individual, who when it comes to his weapons, prefers things his way, as he sees them, and on his terms?
What say you CYDdharta?
And where information from the news media outlets?
  Considerate: 86%  
  Substantial: 82%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.94  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 46%  
  Learn More About Debra
Why do you view the below as irrelevant?
CYDdharta didn't answer the question.
He answered the question this way:
Because, do you know what you sound like?
A an individual, who when it comes to his weapons, prefers things his way, as he sees them, and on his terms?
What say you CYDdharta?
And where information from the news media outlets?
@Zombieguy1987
Do you agree with his points of view?
Have you heard any of the national news media outlets, expressing any dialogue in regards to this:
"pro United States of America. It is, however, pro police state."
@Zombieguy1987
@CYDdharta
Or are maybe some of the national news media outlets being biased, with their news media stories, when it comes to the offenders and their illegal gun violence?
Do the two of you have any counter arguments for that hypothetical point of view?
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 83%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.4  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 55%  
  Learn More About Debra
Blues and Raptors handed two very toxic teams embarrassing losses, 95% of the sports world is rejoicing in the news
Repealing the Second Amendment is the first step to Totalitarianism, and it needs to be prevented to protect our freedom
http://www.atheistrepublic.com/
  Considerate: 82%  
  Substantial: 84%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.72  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 53%  
  Learn More About Debra
"Like other times, your questions are nothing more than to STALL people so they lose interest in the debate"
Do you maybe have any words of condolence for the family in Texas that lost their daughter?
  Considerate: 78%  
  Substantial: 57%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.46  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
Should America have gun control?
How about some the offenders exercising some pro community common sense?
  Considerate: 79%  
  Substantial: 34%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.02  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
Blues and Raptors handed two very toxic teams embarrassing losses, 95% of the sports world is rejoicing in the news
Repealing the Second Amendment is the first step to Totalitarianism, and it needs to be prevented to protect our freedom
http://www.atheistrepublic.com/
  Considerate: 87%  
  Substantial: 53%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.66  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 92%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 72%  
  Substantial: 78%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.08  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 87%  
  Learn More About Debra
The theme of the forum is this:
Should America have gun control?
Then I expressed this to you and CYDdharta both:
Why do you view the below as irrelevant?
CYDdharta didn't answer the question.
He answered the question this way:
Because, do you know what you sound like?
A an individual, who when it comes to his weapons, prefers things his way, as he sees them, and on his terms?
What say you CYDdharta?
And where information from the news media outlets?
@Zombieguy1987
Do you agree with his points of view?
Have you heard any of the national news media outlets, expressing any dialogue in regards to this:
"pro United States of America. It is, however, pro police state."
@Zombieguy1987
@CYDdharta
Or are maybe some of the national news media outlets being biased, with their news media stories, when it comes to the offenders and their illegal gun violence?
Do the two of you have any counter arguments for that hypothetical point of view?
Then your response was this?
"Like other times, your questions are nothing more than to STALL people so they lose interest in the debate."
Was your opinionated response?
So I answered your response with a relevant question.
Do you maybe have any words of condolence for the family in Texas that lost their daughter?
And your response to that revelent question was this?
"How is this relevant to the debate at hand?"
So basically, your response is to, I"m guessing, is to maybe (balk) at any of the questions that you view as irrelevant?
In the face of the theme of the forum:
Should America have gun control?
@Zombieguy1987
Do you maybe have a response to this additional point of view?
How about some the offenders exercising some pro community common sense?
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 80%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.4  
  Sources: 4  
  Relevant (Beta): 62%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 87%  
  Substantial: 82%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.88  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 29%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 82%  
  Substantial: 65%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.44  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
So what you're saying is this, you don't have a single piece of evidence to support your above claim?
@CYDdharta
I understand that you're pro second amendment.
But at the same time, given the above statement from you, are you maybe being (anti first amendment) by taking this stance with the national news media/ press?
"It isn't accurate to say some of the national news media outlets are biased against guns, ALL of the mainstream media are anti-gun. They ALL take the same position and echo the same arguments, and it's always "guns bad"."
When it comes to your second amendment views?
  Considerate: 75%  
  Substantial: 70%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.76  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 78%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 70%  
  Substantial: 90%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.9  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 87%  
  Learn More About Debra
Your answer, you're pro second amendment.
But you're apparently (anti freedom of speech,) by how you apparently, want to judge the media, when it comes to how they educate the public on the crimes committed against it, by the offenders when they commit their crimes with guns?
And you disagree that news media coverage right?
When the media talks about a police officer being killed in the line of duty, do you maybe disagree with that type of news media coverage as well?
  Considerate: 80%  
  Substantial: 84%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.86  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
Blues and Raptors handed two very toxic teams embarrassing losses, 95% of the sports world is rejoicing in the news
Repealing the Second Amendment is the first step to Totalitarianism, and it needs to be prevented to protect our freedom
http://www.atheistrepublic.com/
  Considerate: 68%  
  Substantial: 93%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.88  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 86%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 82%  
  Substantial: 86%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.54  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 79%  
  Substantial: 53%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.08  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 83%  
  Learn More About Debra
TTKDB makes a good answer to the question with good sources
Reality:
TTKDB: Adds more off topic questions and claims to be pro USA
Blues and Raptors handed two very toxic teams embarrassing losses, 95% of the sports world is rejoicing in the news
Repealing the Second Amendment is the first step to Totalitarianism, and it needs to be prevented to protect our freedom
http://www.atheistrepublic.com/
  Considerate: 79%  
  Substantial: 75%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 87%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.06  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 58%  
  Learn More About Debra
Why don't you debate, instead of downplaying debate questions?
Why don't you create your own debate website?
  Considerate: 68%  
  Substantial: 37%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.62  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 75%  
  Learn More About Debra
Blues and Raptors handed two very toxic teams embarrassing losses, 95% of the sports world is rejoicing in the news
Repealing the Second Amendment is the first step to Totalitarianism, and it needs to be prevented to protect our freedom
http://www.atheistrepublic.com/
  Considerate: 66%  
  Substantial: 60%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 87%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.68  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 44%  
  Learn More About Debra
Should America have gun control?
Politics
I do debate, but I can't debate when you
A. Go off topic 95% of the time with questions that are not worth wasting time with.
B. You ignore other people's questions, and shows you want an eco-chamber
C. You're inconsistent. You claim to be pro USA, but you seem to be against things from the U.S
Why don't you create your own debate website? (<--- This right here? is off topicN.E.X.T.!)
Ah, yes... Because as a 17 year old I have the money to afford to run a debate site...
The theme of the forum is this:
Should America have gun control?
Then I expressed this to you and CYDdharta both:
Why do you view the below as irrelevant?
CYDdharta didn't answer the question.
He answered the question this way:
Because, do you know what you sound like?
A an individual, who when it comes to his weapons, prefers things his way, as he sees them, and on his terms?
What say you CYDdharta?
And where information from the news media outlets?
@Zombieguy1987
Do you agree with his points of view?
Have you heard any of the national news media outlets, expressing any dialogue in regards to this:
"pro United States of America. It is, however, pro police state."
@Zombieguy1987
@CYDdharta
Or are maybe some of the national news media outlets being biased, with their news media stories, when it comes to the offenders and their illegal gun violence?
Do the two of you have any counter arguments for that hypothetical point of view?
Then your response was this?
"Like other times, your questions are nothing more than to STALL people so they lose interest in the debate."
Was your opinionated response?
So I answered your response with a relevant question.
Do you maybe have any words of condolence for the family in Texas that lost their daughter?
And your response to that revelent question was this?
"How is this relevant to the debate at hand?"
So basically, your response is to, I"m guessing, is to maybe (balk) at any of the questions that you view as irrelevant?
In the face of the theme of the forum:
Should America have gun control?
@Zombieguy1987
Do you maybe have a response to this additional point of view?
How about some the offenders exercising some pro community common sense?
  Considerate: 79%  
  Substantial: 80%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.36  
  Sources: 8  
  Relevant (Beta): 53%  
  Learn More About Debra
Blues and Raptors handed two very toxic teams embarrassing losses, 95% of the sports world is rejoicing in the news
Repealing the Second Amendment is the first step to Totalitarianism, and it needs to be prevented to protect our freedom
http://www.atheistrepublic.com/
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 80%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.38  
  Sources: 10  
  Relevant (Beta): 48%  
  Learn More About Debra
I'm going to play your game...
Why don't you answer @CYDdharta question?
How is denying people their rights pro United States of America?
He's asked this question several times yet you've cared to answer, yet he and I have answered your most of your questions
Blues and Raptors handed two very toxic teams embarrassing losses, 95% of the sports world is rejoicing in the news
Repealing the Second Amendment is the first step to Totalitarianism, and it needs to be prevented to protect our freedom
http://www.atheistrepublic.com/
  Considerate: 85%  
  Substantial: 63%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 85%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.78  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 83%  
  Learn More About Debra
I do debate, but I can't debate when you
A. Go off topic 95% of the time with questions that are not worth wasting time with.
B. You ignore other people's questions, and shows you want an eco-chamber
C. You're inconsistent. You claim to be pro USA, but you seem to be against things from the U.S
I asked questions that are relevant to the theme of the forum
And my position was stated clearly.
So please refrain from telling me what my position seems to be?
I'm pro community, pro family,, pro law, pro second amendment, pro first amendment, pro freedom of choice, and pro common sense.
And the above positions have been added to the debate, because of how you Zombieguy1987 and CYDdhartda are debating this debate.
  Considerate: 84%  
  Substantial: 61%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.66  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 27%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 83%  
  Substantial: 63%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.7  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 30%  
  Learn More About Debra
How is denying people their rights pro United States of America?
When some of the offenders, kill innocent people with their weapons, aren't they denying their victims, their rights to their own lives, that the offender took from them via the offenders gun violence committed against their victims?
  Considerate: 62%  
  Substantial: 71%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.1  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 69%  
  Substantial: 87%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.98  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
(When some of the offenders, kill innocent people with their weapons, aren't they denying their victims, their rights to their own lives, that the offender took from them via the offenders gun violence committed against their victims?)
"Criminals commit crimes, that's not exactly news, nor is it a reason to deny people their rights.'
So the above is your commentary towards the criminals who killed innocent people with their guns, and they denied their victims their right to their very own life?
So maybe as long as you have your weapons, and when the criminals again make the news because they killed an innocent person, it's maybe just another day, and another news story to some people, right?
Maybe the unspoken word that hasn't been expressed yet, is the one called (empathy?)
Do you maybe feel bad for the victim and, they losing their rights, while you get to have yours?
Think about that? You get to have your rights, while the victim of an offenders gun violance took their rights away from them?
How do you feel about that?
@Zombieguy1987
How do you feel about the above?
  Considerate: 75%  
  Substantial: 84%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.98  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
Blues and Raptors handed two very toxic teams embarrassing losses, 95% of the sports world is rejoicing in the news
Repealing the Second Amendment is the first step to Totalitarianism, and it needs to be prevented to protect our freedom
http://www.atheistrepublic.com/
  Considerate: 76%  
  Substantial: 84%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.02  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 90%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 74%  
  Substantial: 91%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.38  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
"Empathy?!? If you want to talk about your feelings, go see a shrink or a priest. The law should be about facts and logic, full stop. The fact is, criminals will still commit crimes, and NOTHING you have suggested will keep people from becoming victims of armed offenders."
Do you personally know of anyone having lost their own lives to an offenders gun violance?
Texas deals with it.
Chicago deals with it.
Los Angeles deals with it.
How many of the other neighborhoods, counties, cities, and that maybe don't effect the neighborhood where you live in right?
Empathy, is for the clergy to preach about right?
Or a grieving mom or dad to talk to talk to their shrink about right?
Let the religious individuals and shrinks deal with that empathy word right?
Empathy doesn't hold a candle to the second amendment does it?
  Considerate: 59%  
  Substantial: 94%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 87%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.92  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
@Zombieguy1987 ;
How do you feel about the above?
You aren't familiar with the word empathy?
So having empathy for the victims of gun violance, is something you're not understanding, according to your attached meme?
  Considerate: 63%  
  Substantial: 66%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 83%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.52  
  Sources: 3  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 61%  
  Substantial: 95%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 87%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.2  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 75%  
  Substantial: 86%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.42  
  Sources: 5  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
These are your words:
"Well, you managed to accomplish something, you've pointed out another place empathy has no place; in a debate. Your position that criminals commit crimes so we have to restrict everyone's rights even though that won't stop criminals from committing crimes isn't very convincing."
So are you maybe, saying that the deaths from gun violence, and the kids killed by gun violance don't count in this very debate?
The criminals and their violent gun crimes, they don't count either, I'm guessing as well right?
But your second amendment right, matters more than the above apparently does?
@CYDdharta
Are you weapons owner extremist?
  Considerate: 64%  
  Substantial: 89%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.86  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
"Where is your empathy for the people you would make victims of gun violence because they were either denied or were waiting to obtain the means to exercise their right to self-defense?"
I feel sad and sorrowful, for those kids and teachers, who have been affected by gun violance over the years.
I feel sad and sorrowful, for the Vegas victims and their families.
I feel sad and sorrowful, for the thousands of innocent people harmed, and their families affected by the gun violance.
  Considerate: 70%  
  Substantial: 84%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.8  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 47%  
  Substantial: 96%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.9  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
It's amazing, that some of the ex convicts, who are on parole, are maybe with a certain probability, walking around the country, with a hot or stolen weapon on their person.
So to them, if they haven't been caught with a firearm on them, then they haven't broken any laws yet, until they break another law, right, second amendment enthusiasts?
Hot, meaning it lacks a serial number.
But hey, (the pro community, pro family, pro law, pro second amendment, and pro first amendment,) don't worry over the offenders, who might be walking around illegally armed, because some of the second amendment enthusiasts, maybe say so?
Is the above maybe how some of the second amendment enthusiasts, and some of their logic works?
  Considerate: 71%  
  Substantial: 74%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.64  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 68%  
  Substantial: 87%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.26  
  Sources: 3  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
"Incorrect, there is already a law against felons having guns. There is already a law against removing serial numbers from a gun. Criminals don't follow the law. Passing even more laws that criminals won't follow won't help. All you're doing is proving the weakness of your position."
Those criminals have, and are showing the public, and the families of the victims killed by the offenders, via their actions, that your individual pro weapons points of view, apparently aren't good enough as well?
  Considerate: 62%  
  Substantial: 85%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.6  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 58%  
  Substantial: 80%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 84%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.78  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 82%  
  Learn More About Debra
And apparently neither do you.
Are your weapons rights, maybe more important to you, than those lives lost to an offenders gun violence?
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2017/oct/02/america-mass-shootings-gun-violence
From the article:
"Mass shootings in the US: there have been 1,624 in 1,870 days
No other developed nation comes close to the rate of US gun violence. Americans own an estimated 265m guns, more than one gun for every adult.
Data from the Gun Violence Archive reveals there is a mass shooting – defined as four or more people shot in one incident, not including the shooter – nine out of every 10 days on average"
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 83%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.5  
  Sources: 3  
  Relevant (Beta): 67%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 45%  
  Substantial: 85%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.94  
  Sources: 3  
  Relevant (Beta): 89%  
  Learn More About Debra
No, you're failing, because you're acting like someone is non existingly trying to take any gun owners rights away from them.
Kids and adults have been murdered by offenders abusing the laws in the United States, and you're arguing over a non existent point of view.
"FAIL!! You have YET to demonstrate how forcing gun owners and would-be gun owners to give up their rights will stop mass shootings and other attacks sensationalized by the media.
Kids and adults being killed by an offenders gun violence, isn't idiotic trying to appeal to some emotional logic driven fallacies.
But I'm learning plenty about you, and your pro weapons points of view.
If you want a possibly constructive debate, give up these idiotic appeal to emotion logic fallacies and start at the beginning with a reasonable and reachable goal.
Are you trying to push your pro weapons politics on the forum with the above rhetoric?
Is this your goal: Hey pro community, pro family, pro law public, give you the benefit of doubt that you're apparently lobbying for, and just live with gun violence because the gun toting offenders are going to hurt, maim, cripple, and kill innocent people, and there's nothing, that you the pro family, and pro communities, can't I guess, do anything about the criminals and their crimes, being committed with their guns, right CYDdhartda?
Just ignore what the biased news media coverage says in regards to the gun violence murders, and nationwide gun violence, right CYDdhartda?
See all of the above, from your mindset, and do what you want, right CYDdhartda?
Isn't that what you're lobbying for?
  Considerate: 45%  
  Substantial: 94%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.38  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 47%  
  Substantial: 94%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.54  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
If anyone on the website, is from the Houston Texas area, and you have any information that could help the family, and help the local police solve this case, please reach out to them.
  Considerate: 93%  
  Substantial: 45%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.54  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 44%  
  Learn More About Debra
"Once again, try to read and comprehend; you have YET to demonstrate how forcing gun owners and would-be gun owners to give up their rights will stop mass shootings and other attacks sensationalized by the media."
Your pro gun points of view seem to point to this unstated by you?
You're using your pro gun stance to lobby to the pro community citizens, and the pro family citizens to do things your way?
Apparently regardless, of how many innocent people have been killed via an offenders gun violence?
  Considerate: 67%  
  Substantial: 89%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.88  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 68%  
  Substantial: 91%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.94  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
Show me, one instance where I said, what you're stating below?
I haven't said one word, about forcing gun owners, or would be gun owners to give up their rights, have I?
Now, you have some research to do.
And you pay plenty of rhetoric service to your own gun owner rights, don't you?
  Considerate: 67%  
  Substantial: 79%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.24  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 78%  
  Substantial: 94%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.86  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra